Key Differences
In short — Phenom X4 9550 outperforms Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Phenom X4 9550 is 235 days older than Core i7-965.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 8 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2580 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
48.24742268041237%
Multi-Core
712
42.30540701128936%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i7-965 |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 Extreme |
Agena | Codename | Bloomfield |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 130 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |