Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 4255 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 47% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Phenom X4 9550 - 303 vs 206 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
303
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.29
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €56.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2426 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
24.45141065830721%
Multi-Core
712
36.050632911392405%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Athlon |
Agena | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |