Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 4887 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Phenom II X4 925 - 199 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 32 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €436.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
10.763538513286242%
Multi-Core
930
4.626635490771604%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Deneb | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |