Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 4007 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Phenom II X4 925 - 137 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 16 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €349.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
18.823529411764707%
Multi-Core
930
11.505629098107137%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Deneb | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |