Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF and the cheaper Core i7-10700F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-10700F - 137 vs 135 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - €199.95 vs €249.9
- Up to 19% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-10700KF - €1.48 vs €1.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.82/FPS
81%
Price, €
€249.9
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for €249.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5958 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €199.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5958 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |