Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 4327 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 32% better in Alan Wake 2 than Phenom II X4 925 - 127 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 16 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €495.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 305 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
13.810962451445835%
Multi-Core
930
9.185185185185185%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Deneb | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |