Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 3725 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 36% better in Dead Island 2 than Phenom II X4 810 - 152 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom II X4 810
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Deneb | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 13.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
