Key Differences
In short — Celeron G530 outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G530 is 937 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Performs up to 2% better in Sea of Thieves than Phenom II X4 810 - 201 vs 198 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
---|---|---|
Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Celeron |
Deneb | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |