Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 2885 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 7% better in Rust than Phenom II X4 810 - 158 vs 147 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
158
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €20.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Celeron |
Deneb | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |