Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-6300 outperforms the more expensive FX-9370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-6300 is 812 days newer than the more expensive FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-9370 - 134 vs 128 FPS
- Up to 45% cheaper than FX-9370 - €121.5 vs €219.97
- Up to 47% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than FX-9370 - €0.91 vs €1.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 51 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €219.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €121.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
220 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |