Buy on Amazon
€219.97
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $219
Availability
MSRP in USD: $219
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the more expensive FX-9370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1400 days newer than the more expensive FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 8% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-9370 - 127 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than FX-9370 - €99.0 vs €219.97
- Up to 58% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-9370 - €0.78 vs €1.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 12 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Amd FX-9370 Black Edition - 4,4 GHz - Sockel AM3+ (FD9370FHHKWOX)
Buy for €219.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 266 minutes ago
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
127
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD CPU Ryzen 5 1600 AM4
Buy for €99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 272 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-9370
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 220 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
