Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2515 days newer than the cheaper FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €219.97 vs €270.82
- Up to 12% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-10900F - €1.72 vs €1.96 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-9370 - 138 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 20 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €219.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 969 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
138
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.96/FPS
87%
Price, €
€270.82
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for €270.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 969 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |