Key Differences
In short — FX-9370 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-9370 is 470 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Performs up to 1% better in Far Cry 3 than FX-6200 - 122 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 81% cheaper than FX-9370 - €42.6 vs €219.97
- Up to 81% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than FX-9370 - €0.35 vs €1.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 125 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €219.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-9370 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 3 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |