Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100 is 2139 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8350 - 135 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than FX-8350 - €84.88 vs €155.88
- Up to 49% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than FX-8350 - €0.63 vs €1.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €84.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |