Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 27% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600X - €155.88 vs €213.38
- Up to 10% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 7600X - €1.4 vs €1.55 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 24% better in Elden Ring than FX-8350 - 138 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6836 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
138
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.55/FPS
90%
Price, €
€213.38
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for €213.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6836 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |