Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 364 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 25% better in Starfield than FX-8320E - 55 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
55
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€133.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €133.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |