Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2061 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than FX-8320E - 122 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
122
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€106.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €106.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |