Buy on Amazon
€120.06
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2067 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 10% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-8320E - 350 vs 318 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
350
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€120.06
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-10400 Desktop-Prozessor, 6 Kerne, bis zu 4,3 GHz, LGA1200 (Chipsatz der Intel® 400er-Reihe), 65 W
Buy for €120.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18009 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
