Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 2443 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 31% better in Far Cry 3 than FX-8320E - 158 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i5-11400H |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Tiger Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 45 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | No |