Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 1589 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than FX-8320E - 116 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
