Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5650U outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5650U is 180 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5650U - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5650U
- Performs up to 28% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than FX-8320E - 86 vs 67 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i7-5650U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i7-5650U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Vishera | Codename | Broadwell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 6000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
