Buy on Amazon
€78.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 124 days older than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 5% better in DOOM Eternal than FX-8320E - 473 vs 450 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
473
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel CM8064601483643 Core i3-4150 Prozessor (Sockel 1150, 2x 3,5GHz, 3MB Cache)
Buy for €78.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
