Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-6600K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-6600K is 427 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 54 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-4150 - 239 vs 226 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i3-4150 - €74.94 vs €78.99
- Up to 11% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i3-4150 - €0.31 vs €0.35 per FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €78.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
239
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 91 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |