Buy on Amazon
€51.75
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 364 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in Escape From Tarkov than FX-8320E - 191 vs 188 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
191
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2,80GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
