Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6500 outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6500 is 303 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6500 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500
- Performs up to 12% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8320E - 169 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77027 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i5-6500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |