Key Differences
In short — FX-8320 outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8320 is 415 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Performs up to 0% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G530 - 211 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |