Key Differences
In short — FX-8320 outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8320 is 377 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-4100 - 149 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €19.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 334 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |