Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7845HX outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7845HX is 4102 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
- Performs up to 46% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-8150 - 156 vs 107 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Ryzen 9 7845HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Dragon Range |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
