Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600 outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600 is 4102 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600
- Performs up to 31% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8150 - 151 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i5-13600
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 14 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
