Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8840HS is 4438 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
- Performs up to 16% better in Rocket League than FX-8150 - 777 vs 672 FPS
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 28 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Ryzen 7 8840HS
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Not Available |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
