Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G5400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium Gold G5400 is 1987 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 59% cheaper than Pentium Gold G5400 - €49.68 vs €122.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing Deathloop than Pentium Gold G5400 - €0.3 vs €0.72 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G5400 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than FX-6300 - 170 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 58 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
170
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
41%
Price, €
€122
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €122 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G5400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |