Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - €49.68 vs €101.9
- Up to 48% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-11400F - €0.34 vs €0.65 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Dead Space than FX-6300 - 156 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3921 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
156
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
52%
Price, €
€101.9
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for €101.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3921 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |