Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - €49.68 vs €254.03
- Up to 70% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-11900F - €0.35 vs €1.16 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 56% better in Dirt 5 than FX-6300 - 219 vs 140 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
219
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.16/FPS
30%
Price, €
€254.03
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €254.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |