Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 1700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1475 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 7 1700X - 252 vs 238 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - €104.97 vs €572.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-11900F - €0.44 vs €2.27 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
252
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.27/FPS
19.383259911894275%
Price, €
€572
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €572 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
238
94.44444444444444%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€104.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €104.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Single-Core
1088
50.11515430677107%
Multi-Core
5574
60.77854105332025%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |