Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 1843 days newer than Pentium G3250.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Performs up to 9% better in Far Cry 5 than Pentium G3250 - 203 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 128 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 53 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
187
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€22.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €22.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
EPYC | Collection | Pentium |
Rome | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
225 W | TDP | 53 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |