Buy on Amazon
€20.54
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 946 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Performs up to 2% better in Resident Evil Village than Celeron G3930T - 298 vs 292 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 128 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 35 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
292
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.54
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930T 2,7 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 35 W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €20.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| EPYC | Collection | Celeron |
| Rome | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 225 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
