Buy on Amazon
€210.77
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 587 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 128 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 18% better in Grand Theft Auto V than EPYC 7742 - 148 vs 125 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 125 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€210.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-11600K 11. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 3.9GHz Tuboboost: 4.9GHz, 6 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070811600K
Buy for €210.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18642 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rome | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 6 |
128 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using EPYC 7742 or Core i5-11600K
Grand Theft Auto V, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
114 FPS
€10.09/FPS
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Core i5-11600K
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€1,149.9
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
