Buy on Amazon
€123.31
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 1436 days older than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 128 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 23 than EPYC 7742 - 209 vs 205 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 51 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-6300
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
209
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€123.31
100%
FPS and Value Winner
INTEL Core i3-6300 3,8GHz LGA1151 4MB Cache Tray CPU
Buy for €123.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i3-6300
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
| Rome | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 225 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
