Buy on Amazon
€80
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1510 days newer than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 174% better in Immortals of Aveum than Athlon 3000G - 104 vs 38 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 32 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD Athlon 3000G 3.5 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread Tray-Processor CPU YD3000C6M2OFH AM4 Sockel
Buy for €80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75709 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
31.688741721854303%
Multi-Core
1975
10.810071154898742%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
