Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2521 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than FX-6100 - 200 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 6 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
200
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€85.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €85.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Athlon | Collection | FX |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |