Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 922 days newer than the more expensive Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Athlon 200GE - 132 vs 122 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than Athlon 200GE - €74.28 vs €100.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Athlon 200GE - €0.56 vs €0.82 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12132 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.28
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €74.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i3 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |