Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms the cheaper Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-965 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 3580 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-965.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 7% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-965 - 162 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Up to 33% cheaper than Athlon 200GE - €66.63 vs €100.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Athlon 200GE - €0.44 vs €0.62 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 8 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12061 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
152
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12061 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | Intel Core i7-965 |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i7 Extreme |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Bloomfield |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |