Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Ankermann Business V2 Work on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 1250% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ankermann Business V2 Work - 81 vs 6 FPS
- Up to 85% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ankermann Business V2 Work - €17.27 vs €116.5 per FPS
Advantages of Ankermann Business V2 Work Desktop PC
- Up to 50% cheaper than Megaport - €699.0 vs €1399.0
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
38th Variation
FPS
81
100%
Value, €/FPS
€17.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1399
49%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2296 minutes ago
FPS
6
7.4074074074074066%
Value, €/FPS
€116.5/FPS
14.824034334763947%
Price, €
€699
100%
Buy for €699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2306 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
38th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce GT 710
1 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
1.62 GPixel/s
1.0227272727272727%
Texel Fillrate
6.48 GTexel/s
1.422924901185771%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
38th Variation
Ryzen 5 7500F
null-core
Single-Core
2744
100%
Multi-Core
12604
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | Ankermann Business V2 Work Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 7500F | CPU | Core i7-10700F |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce GT 710 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
