Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 38% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Megaport - 102 vs 74 FPS
- Up to 27% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Megaport - €13.72 vs €18.91 per FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
38th Variation
FPS
102
100%
Value, €/FPS
€13.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1399
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1815 minutes ago
30th Variation
FPS
74
72.54901960784314%
Value, €/FPS
€18.91/FPS
72.55420412480169%
Price, €
€1399
100%
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1816 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
38th Variation
30th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
38th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
30th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
76.83080808080808%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
75.71365832235398%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
38th Variation
Ryzen 5 7500F
null-core
Single-Core
2744
100%
Multi-Core
12604
100%
CPU Winner
30th Variation
Ryzen 9 5900X
null-core
Single-Core
2179
79.40962099125365%
Multi-Core
11883
94.27959377975246%
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 5 7500F | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |