Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 24% better in Starfield than Megaport - 51 vs 41 FPS
- Up to 10% better value when playing Starfield than Megaport - €27.43 vs €30.46 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 11% cheaper than Megaport - €1249.0 vs €1399.0
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
38th Variation
FPS
51
100%
Value, €/FPS
€27.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1399
89%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2020 minutes ago
4th Variation
FPS
41
80.3921568627451%
Value, €/FPS
€30.46/FPS
90.05252790544976%
Price, €
€1249
100%
Buy for €1,249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2026 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
38th Variation
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
38th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
38th Variation
Ryzen 5 7500F
null-core
Single-Core
2744
100%
Multi-Core
12604
100%
CPU Winner
4th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
null-core
Single-Core
2121
77.29591836734694%
Multi-Core
9729
77.1897810218978%
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 7500F | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
