Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GameMachines Neo - outperforms the cheaper MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 54% cheaper than GameMachines Neo - - €789.0 vs €1729.0
Advantages of GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 97% better in F1 23 than MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 - 233 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 12% better value when playing F1 23 than MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 - €7.42 vs €8.47 per FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
1st Variation
FPS
118
51%
Value, €/FPS
€8.47/FPS
88%
Price, €
€789
100%
Buy for €789 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
5th Variation
FPS
233
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1729
45%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,729 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 797 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
1st Variation
5th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
34%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
20%
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i5-12400
null-core
Single-Core
2179
73%
Multi-Core
8847
46%
5th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
null-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400 | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
