Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — SYSTEMTREFF Basic outperforms the more expensive MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of SYSTEMTREFF Basic Gaming PC
- Performs up to 56% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 - 28 vs 18 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 - €799.9 vs €999.0
- Up to 45% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 - €30.35 vs €55.5 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
FPS
18
64%
Value, €/FPS
€55.5/FPS
55%
Price, €
€999
80%
Buy for €999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
8th Variation
FPS
28
100%
Value, €/FPS
€30.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€799.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €799.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
8th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
57%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
67%
GPU Winner
8th Variation
Radeon 780M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
92.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
139.2 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i5-12400
null-core
Single-Core
2179
81%
Multi-Core
8847
62%
8th Variation
Ryzen 7 8700G
null-core
Single-Core
2686
100%
Multi-Core
14235
100%
CPU Winner
MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | SYSTEMTREFF Basic Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400 | CPU | Ryzen 7 8700G |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | Radeon 780M |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |