Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper M2A Starship Mini on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing M2A Starship Mini is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of M2A Starship Mini Gaming PC
- Up to 31% cheaper than Megaport - €1699.0 vs €2449.0
- Up to 13% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Megaport - €8.33 vs €9.6 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 25% better in Battlefield 1 than M2A Starship Mini - 255 vs 204 FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53360 minutes ago
12th Variation
FPS
255
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.6/FPS
86.77083333333334%
Price, €
€2449
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52579 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
12th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3080
10 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
164.2 GPixel/s
58.51746258018531%
Texel Fillrate
465.1 GTexel/s
61.07682206172029%
12th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
12th Variation
Ryzen 9 7950X
null-core
Single-Core
2938
100%
Multi-Core
19293
100%
CPU Winner
M2A Starship Mini Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Ryzen 9 7950X |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
