Key Differences
In short — ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End outperforms the cheaper M2A Starship Mini on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing M2A Starship Mini is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of M2A Starship Mini Gaming PC
- Up to 23% cheaper than ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End - €1699.0 vs €2199.95
- Up to 1% better value when playing Dead Space than ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End - €17.52 vs €17.74 per FPS
Advantages of ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 28% better in Dead Space than M2A Starship Mini - 124 vs 97 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
97
78.2258064516129%
Value, €/FPS
€17.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1699
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53387 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€17.74/FPS
98.7598647125141%
Price, €
€2199.95
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,199.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53386 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3080
10 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
164.2 GPixel/s
65.52274541101356%
Texel Fillrate
465.1 GTexel/s
67.50362844702468%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-14700F
null-core
Single-Core
2775
100%
Multi-Core
17332
100%
CPU Winner
M2A Starship Mini Gaming PC | vs | ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-12900 | CPU | Core i7-14700F |
GeForce RTX 3080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |