Key Differences
In short — GameMachines Neo - outperforms the cheaper Kiebel on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Kiebel is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Kiebel Gaming PC
- Up to 36% cheaper than GameMachines Neo - - €1099.0 vs €1729.0
- Up to 2% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than GameMachines Neo - - €3.65 vs €3.71 per FPS
Advantages of GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 55% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Kiebel - 466 vs 301 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 313 minutes ago
5th Variation
FPS
466
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.71/FPS
98%
Price, €
€1729
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,729 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 316 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
13th Variation
5th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
13th Variation
Radeon RX 7600 XT
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
176.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
352.6 GTexel/s
77%
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
null-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
Kiebel Gaming PC | vs | GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 5900X | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| Radeon RX 7600 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
